Tax Risk and Tax Insurance in M&A: In conversation with Dawn Bhoma (Icen Risk) 

Tax Risk and Tax Insurance in M&A: In conversation with Dawn Bhoma (Icen Risk) 

Overview

Tax risk is a feature of every M&A transaction. Buyers need to identify it; sellers want to leave it behind. Increasingly, buyers and sellers are turning to insurance to bridge the gap as an integrated part of deal strategy.

In this podcast, Hannah Manning (Head of Tax at Travers Smith) speaks with Dawn Bhoma (Founder and Managing Principal at Icen Risk) about the evolving role of tax risk and tax insurance: what it covers, how parties are using it, and where the market is heading.

Every buyer wants to understand the tax risks in a business… Nobody wants to hold that risk… Insurance can take some of the emotion and tension out of deals [and the] potential [for] conflict in the future.

The discussion ranges from the practical (what underwriters want to see when being asked to cover a risk) to the strategic, including how sophisticated buyers and sellers are increasingly deploying insurance at earlier stages of a transaction to remove deal friction and improve competitive positioning.

Listen now

Listen to the full conversation.

What the Conversation Covers

The podcast explores themes that are relevant to anyone involved in M&A transactions, including:

How Tax Insurance Operates in Practice

Tax insurance can be used both in Warranty & Indemnity (W&I) policies and for bespoke cover. It can prove especially useful in competitive bid situations to present a cleaner offer, avoiding 'price chips' and requests for specific indemnities. 

Tax insurance now is used in so many innovative ways… funds will use tax insurance in a bid situation to make their bid more attractive than someone else's.

In the US market particularly, lenders now expect tax insurance to be included as a component of deals, with identified risks being either incorporated into a standard W&I policy or 'spun out' into standalone policies that can travel with the entity on future sales.

Routinely Insured Types of Tax Risk

Some risks would have been considered uninsurable a few years ago, but the market is increasingly varied now with common policies covering different types of risk including, for example, those relating to withholding tax, non-resident capital gains tax, debt deductibility, income versus capital characterisation, and a "real uptick in individuals " seeking to cover employment-related securities risks.

Some people think you have to have a very fulsome legal opinion with every single detail thought through. That's not my experience.

The market has, however, now evolved beyond purely technical risks to even encompass areas previously considered 'uninsurable'. Examples here include risks related to valuation risk, where underwriters now engage specialist valuation advisers to facilitate more expansive cover, and risks where clearance in advance from a fiscal authority has not been obtained.

Difficult or Impossible to Place Risks

Exposures that are already under enquiry or the subject of litigation can be placed but inevitably attract materially higher premiums. Despite market growth, Icen Risk still declines approximately half of the risks it receives. The main reason is territorial: a discomfort with a particular court system or the way a tax authority operates.

Many parties want … a 'sleep easy' type of cover, which is why policies tend to cover the tax liability but [also] interest, penalties, defence costs, so that the entire issue is removed. That tends to be the aim with every tax policy.

The second most common ground to refuse cover is a weakness in the technical position. Risks related to the G20/OECD Base Erosion and Profit Shifting (BEPS) Action Plan remain difficult to underwrite given their complexity, while Value Added Tax (VAT) risks in certain sectors can also create difficulty because of tax authority behaviour and because of evolving case law. Insuring in these areas is not impossible but obtaining cover will usually be dependent on the specific facts.

The Claims Process in Practice

The insurer's role is to operate 'behind the scenes' in a claim, reviewing proposed responses and information requests, but insurers will always need to understand the facts to provide the best available policy and support. 

Understanding the facts is important… because to provide a really good policy, we need to stand behind as many of the facts as we can; if we don't have visibility on the facts, really you're insuring theory.

Tax insurance policies are rarely (if ever) denied solely on the grounds of coverage because the bespoke nature of tax policies means the scope must be agreed clearly at inception. The market has also evolved to accommodate insureds that are required (or choose) to maintain an open dialogue with tax authorities, with insurers normally retaining a right to review disclosures before their submission.

Market Dynamics and Growth

The market is rapidly expanding geographically, with brokers establishing tax professionals across different jurisdictions, improving underwriting quality through local knowledge.

Volume is certainly a change… Brokers have done a very good job of establishing tax professionals in European territories [and] the US … Having local expertise makes for a better underwriting team because you can understand better the risks.

Corporates have emerged as significant buyers of cover for the first time in the last two to three years. This probably reflects insureds valuing certainty and the removal of risk, at an acceptable price point, in an environment where tax law is getting ever more complex.

The Future of Tax Insurance

Further significant growth in the tax insurance market is likely because of the evolution of tax legislation globally and because many clients have still not heard about the benefits of tax insurance. 

Underwriting to me is an art rather than a science. It needs human judgement. Just as you make a judgement on tax interpretation, we need to make the same judgement on whether it's something that we wish to underwrite and at what price.

The emerging relevance of artificial intelligence (AI) in tax is also discussed, including how tax authorities are already using AI in ways likely to affect how they target audit activity, and how underwriters can deploy it as an efficiency tool. 

The Speakers

Hannah Manning is Head of Tax at Travers Smith, advising on the tax aspects of M&A transactions, private equity investments, and corporate restructurings.

Dawn Bhoma is the Founder and Managing Principal of ICEN Risk, a leading insurer of M&A tax risk. Dawn trained as a tax lawyer before moving into insurance underwriting. She founded Icen Risk in 2018 and has built one of the market's largest dedicated tax underwriting teams, insuring risks across the UK, Europe, and the US.

Back To Top Back To Top chevron up