The BPF has opposed the policy, largely on the basis that it reflects a misunderstanding as to the causes of vacancy which, they believe, are connected to an oversupply of retail units in many locations, in the context of the huge growth in online sales, combined with the impact of business rates. On a practical level, they suggest that the regime should not apply where landlords can prove that they are actively marketing a unit themselves.
They also point out that many of the vacant units in question are likely to be of lower quality than most occupied units, and will therefore require significant investment to bring them up to a lettable standard. Landlords may not have the funds needed to carry out these works. It could be seen to be unreasonable to expect them to carry out expensive works in return for a tenant potentially paying very little rent, as there is no de minimis rental level in the standard lease.
However, there is also some scepticism as to how often this fairly cumbersome new regime will be utilised in practice.
The new regime also needs to be considered in light of the report published by the Built Environment Committee of the House of Lords on 28 November 2024 called "High Streets: Life Beyond Retail", which recommends that the Government should support local authorities to make use of the new High Street Rental Auction powers, but also suggests that regenerating high streets will involve a wide range of strategies including introducing public services such as libraries and healthcare centres into high streets, as well as ensuring that there are more green spaces nearby, improving access by public transport and reforming business rates.