Why does HMRC consider reform is needed?
The tax rules surrounding distributions have remained largely unchanged since Corporation Tax was introduced in 1965. HMRC's stated concern is that the current framework allows economically similar payments to shareholders to be taxed inconsistently — in particular, that well-advised shareholders can use restructuring techniques to extract value from continuing businesses at capital gains tax rates rather than dividend rates of income tax.
HMRC also identify distortions arising from the different treatment of distributions from UK and non-UK resident companies, and gaps in the taxation of loans from overseas entities. The consultation frames the proposals as an exercise in modernisation and consistency, addressing (what HMRC consider to be) unintended consequences arising from the operation of the rules and its reliance on anti-avoidance rules to counteract them.
What does the consultation cover?
The consultation addresses seven related areas:
- Reductions of capital – HMRC proposes to "freeze" the amount of share capital recognised for distribution purposes where a holding company has been interposed via a share-for-share exchange.
The capital on shares in the new holding company would be limited to the amount originally subscribed for the underlying shares, matching the deferred CGT base cost. The effect would be that share buybacks or capital reductions through a new holding company would produce substantially the same income tax result as a direct extraction from the original company.
- Demergers – The capital reduction proposal would remove the non-statutory capital reduction demerger route. As a result, HMRC propose to 'liberalise' the conditions for statutory demerger relief.
Proposed changes include removing the UK residence requirement, extending the relief to investment companies, replacing the 'substantially all' test with an 'all' test (for clarity), and introducing fixed time-based restrictions (generally five years) in place of the current open-ended anti-avoidance conditions.
- Distributions from non-UK resident companies – HMRC proposes to align the income tax treatment of distributions from non-UK companies with that already applying to UK companies.
Currently, only dividends that are not of a capital nature are charged to income tax when paid by non-UK companies. The proposal would extend the charge to cover the full range of distribution types (as defined in the legislation). HMRC are also seeking views on how to address differences between UK definition of 'distribution' and non-UK corporate law concepts.
- Interaction between distributions and loans to participators – HMRC proposes priority rules to clarify whether an extraction of value should be taxed as a distribution (charged on the shareholder) or under the loans to participators regime (charged on the company).
Options include legislating the current discretionary practice of unwinding inadvertent distributions and allowing income tax paid on an unlawful distribution to be set off against liabilities arising when the position is rectified.
- Loans from non-UK resident companies – HMRC are considering extending the loans to participators regime to cover loans from non-UK companies that would be 'close' if it were UK resident.
A non-UK resident company is outside the scope UK tax so any tax charge would fall on the individual borrower. The consultation presents four options for implementing the charge, ranging from a charge arising at the end of the tax year to a deemed release after a set period.
- Purchase of own shares (POS) – HMRC propose replacing the subjective 'trade benefit test' in the rules permitting a purchase of own shares with more mechanical conditions.
These include a minimum 5% shareholding and two-year working requirement, full exit from the company within two years, a five-year claw-back period, and extended holding periods where family connections remain.
- Transactions in securities (TiS) – In another fundamental piece of reform, HMRC propose to replace the existing 'transactions in securities' rules with a modernised, principles-based anti-avoidance regime.
The aim is to create a backstop that is clearer and does not depend on HMRC counteraction or proof of motive, while not affecting legitimate commercial restructurings.
Why does this matter?
The proposals, if enacted in their current form, could affect a broad range of commercial activity including: