The draft text of the GBF has been praised by many for directly addressing a wide range of key biodiversity issues. However, there are concerns about how this global framework will translate into national action and indeed, how action from other stakeholders, such as the private sector (including financial institutions), can be used to facilitate change.
There are also concerns that countries may cherry-pick easier targets to deliver, leading to the more onerous biodiversity goals being ignored. As was the case with the Paris Agreement, there are also suggestions that the draft framework does not properly take into account global inequalities and how historically some stakeholders have benefitted more from activities which have contributed to biodiversity loss than others. Given that nature-based solutions are high on the COP26 agenda, the outcome of COP15 will directly impact the discussions and negotiations that take place at COP26 the following month.
The level of ambition and cooperation at COP15, in continuing the conversation around how to tackle biodiversity loss, will be a crucial indicator as to how successful COP26 will be in mobilising action to tackle climate change, especially in the context of the ongoing COVID-19 Pandemic. That said, the further delay to finalising the text of the GBF until spring 2022 will also increase the already mounting pressure on the international community to make meaningful commitments in order that biodiversity loss can first be stopped and then hopefully reversed over the coming years.
Travers Smith will continue to provide analysis on the latest developments in this area and in relation to COP26 as and when they are announced.