Talking Secondaries - Use of deferred consideration mechanisms in the secondaries market

Overview

The use of deferred consideration mechanisms in secondary transactions has been increasing throughout the recent years due to a challenging macroeconomic environment. These mechanisms are a popular tool to bridge valuation gaps and mitigate uncertainty. In this latest instalment of our Talking Secondaries series, we discuss the commonly used deferred consideration mechanisms seen in the secondary market.

Commonly used deferred consideration mechanisms

The reliance on deferred consideration in the secondary market is an evolving trend and as such, there is currently no market standard approach. Interestingly this is something of a 'back to the future' moment. A significant number of early secondary deals, especially sale of bank portfolios, were vendor financed. As fund level financing became more sophisticated, available vendor financing almost disappeared. But, in recent times, it has had something of a resurgence. Similarly to M&A transactions, there are multiple ways to use deferred consideration in secondary transactions. Some of the more commonly used mechanisms include: (i) performance based earnouts; and (ii) loan notes.

When secondary transactions are subject to earnout requirements, a portion of the consideration is paid on completion and following this, additional amounts will be due and payable if the negotiated milestones (for example, hurdle rates) are met, as indicated in the structure charts above. The market has seen an increased use of earnouts over traditional escrow structures.

When incorporating loan notes as a form of deferred consideration, a portion of the consideration is paid on completion. The seller then accepts loan notes from the buyer for the outstanding consideration and effectively becomes a creditor of the buyer until such loan notes are settled.

Key considerations

Deferred consideration is an attractive tool for sellers that are seeking to divest interests in response to overallocations and, in return for delayed consideration, want to achieve the best aggregate purchase price. In addition, deferred consideration allows buyers to bridge valuation gaps and utilise payment facilities in a market with increased interest rates.

Potential advantages

  • Against the backdrop of the increased cost of debt facilities, vendor financing has become an attractive alternative to third-party borrowing

  • Utilising these mechanisms can assist both the buyer and seller to bridge the valuation gap

  • When the seller is disposing of interests due to overallocation, the use of deferred consideration provides an opportunity to adjust allocations whilst receiving a higher aggregate consideration

  • Depending on the performance of the portfolio, one party may benefit from the change in portfolio valuation, and therefore purchase price discount, at the time the consideration has been paid in full

  • The buyer’s internal rate of return may increase because a portion of the capital used to fund the consideration will be invested at a later date

Potential disadvantages

  • The seller will not receive the full purchase price at the time of closing, which can be a gating factor for a seller in need of liquidity

  • Depending on the transaction, the general partner may be required to consent and/or agree to the deferred consideration mechanism

  • The purchase agreement will need to be carefully considered and additional terms such as covenants, default penalties and acceleration events will require negotiation. Such covenants will place additional restrictions on the buyer
Back To Top Back To Top chevron up